AAN Editors

14 September, 2015

Burning remaining fossil fuels could cause 60-meter sea-level rise

PRCaldeiraAntarcticIceSheetImage

Burning all of the world’s available fossil-fuels would result in the complete melting of the Antarctic ice sheet, according to new study to be published in Science Advances. The new research demonstrates that the planet’s remaining fossil fuel resources would be sufficient to melt nearly all of Antarctica if burned, leading to a 50- or 60-meter (160- to 200-foot) rise in sea level.

According to lead author Ricarda Winkelmann of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research:

“If we were to burn all attainable fossil fuel resources, this would eliminate the Antarctic ice sheet and cause long-term global sea-level rise unprecedented in human history.”

This is the first study to model the effects of unrestrained fossil-fuel burning on the entirety of the Antarctic ice sheet. The research found that the West Antarctic ice sheet becomes unstable if carbon emissions continue at current levels for 60 to 80 years, representing only 6 to 8 percent of the 10,000 billion tons of carbon that could be released if we use all accessible fossil fuels. According to c0-author Ken Cadiera:

“Our findings show that if we do not want to melt Antarctica, we can’t keep taking fossil fuel carbon out of the ground and just dumping it into the atmosphere as CO2 like we’ve been doing. If we don’t stop dumping our waste CO2 into the sky, land that is now home to more than a billion people will one day be underwater.”

Press releases from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Carnegie Institution for Science have more from the authors. The New York Times’s Andy Revkin has a video chat with the authors over at his Dot Earth blog. The paper also covered the story here. RTCC, The Independent, The Guardian, Reuters and TIME all have more on the new study. You can also read Carbon Brief’s write up.

About The Author

*Check your email inbox to confirm subscription.

News
& Briefs

latest news

17
Sep
US and Australian taxpayers pay billions a year to fund coal - report
Screen Shot 2015-09-17 at 12.20.53 PM
Coal subsidies are costing US and Australian taxpayers billions of dollars a year - amounting to almost a quarter of the sale price in some cases - according to a new report. And ending them would lead to cuts in coal use equivalent to shutting up to 32 coal-fired power stations.
The Guardian
17
Sep
Interview: Craig Bennett, the new CEO of Friend’s of the Earth
Bennett-20150429111242493
The new boss at Friends of the Earth discusses energy, climate and politics in an in-depth interview with Carbon Brief.
Carbon Brief
17
Sep
Joss Garman: What would a successful Paris summit mean for the battle against climate change?
Joss Garman argues that positive effects of the Paris negotiations are already being seen in unilateral commitments by major polluting nations, including China and the US, and that the foundations are in place to reach a vital agreement on how progress is measured and compared.
IPPR
17
Sep
Wind industry says could supply 25 percent of EU electricity by 2030
Wind turbines are pictured in RWE Offshore-Windpark Nordsee Ost in the North sea, 30 km from Helgoland, Germany, May 11, 2015.  REUTERS/Christian Charisius/Pool
Wind farms could supply a quarter of the European Union’s electricity needs by 2030 if member states come good on energy and climate pledges, an industry report said on Wednesday.
Reuters
17
Sep
EU pressured to champion key elements for strong Paris outcome
The Tree
17
Sep
More people die from air pollution than Malaria and HIV/Aids, new study shows
Screen Shot 2015-09-17 at 11.42.34 AM
More than 3 million people a year are killed prematurely by outdoor air pollution, according to a landmark new study, more than malaria and HIV/Aids combined.
The Guardian