UN climate talks wrap in Bonn

photo credit: Thomas

UN climate change negotiations came to a close on Sunday. The final judgement by many of our partners was cautiously welcome the slow drumbeat building toward the international agreement due to be signed in Paris at the end of next year.

One of the key deliverables was that countries would agree a process for moving from their substance-based conversations - around cutting emissions, adaptation, climate finance, and other issues - to actual an actual draft negotiating text for the planned the 2015 climate agreement. WWF’s Tasneem Essop described the meeting as a constructive session, “We leave Bonn with a bit more clarity about what parties are expected to do in terms of work toward a draft text in Lima. So the structure and some of the positions that parties have already submitted will be captured by the chairs.”

Governments agreed to add 6 days of climate talks to their negotiating calendar in October, giving them more time to make progress before the Conference of Parties in Lima this December. According to Essop, “Now the hard work needs to happen. We’ll need to be sure that parties come here by October ready to negotiate and be in a position to have a draft text by Lima.”

The world’s three largest greenhouse gas emitters, China, the US and European Union, have all signaled that they will make concrete proposals on their national contributions to the 2015 climate treaty in the first half of next year. While that’s another step in the right direction, it doesn’t go far enough.

Union of Concerned Scientists’ Alden Meyer described more of the ‘hard work’ ahead: “We haven’t heard from some of the other big players about timing, so that’s a bit of a concern. We have to get more of them to say they will put their proposal forward.” Also of note, “We didn’t get an assessment phase. What happens when countries have put their proposals forward? How are they evaluated both collectively, against the 2º temperature goal, and individually in terms of equity and fairness… so that still remains to be worked out in Lima, and I think it’s going to be a very tough fight.”

The 2015 deal itself is primarily focused on the post-2020 world; but in order for it to succeed, governments need to increase climate action and accelerate emissions reductions before 2020. The Bonn meeting offered hope on that front as well. A series of meetings on opportunities to reduce emissions in cities, through land use change, and through renewable energy and energy efficiency spurred questions and ideas on how their impacts can be scaled by leveraging the UNFCCCs various current mechanisms.

In a press conference on Sunday, Essop said: “We have to see the constructive spirit of these discussions translate into real political momentum. We have to keep our focus on the pre-2020 period, and close the growing gap between the actions countries have committed to and what the science tells us we need. We have to build on the momentum we saw here in Bonn if we are to have a successful outcome in Lima.”

FROM OUR PARTNERS

n terms of building on positive momentum, the upcoming Climate Leaders Summit in New York this September is the opportunity. The Summit will be the first time a large group of Heads of State meet to specifically to talk and take action on climate change since 2009, and carries with it the potential to drive climate issues back to the top of the political agenda. A number of our partners have laid plans for a massive public mobilization in New York prior to the Summit. And partners in Bonn met to organize parallel actions and events in capitals around the world.

If you’re planning to be anywhere near New York in late September, join us. If you’re interested in organizing or participating in parallel actions elsewhere, we can connect you to others doing the same.

IN THE NEWS

Both Duetsche Welle and AFP, whose story was picked up by major newspapers around the world, focused on the need for significant climate finance pledges to come out of the Climate Leaders Summit in September in order to unlock further progress.

RESOURCES

In addition to videos of Tasneem Essop and Alden Meyer’s big picture analysis. Meyer gave us a taste of what to look for in the US in the coming months. Our Negotiator Trackers also caught up with Enrique Muartua Konstantinidis from Fundacion Biosfera, who described what Bonn and the months leading up to the COP in Lima mean for Latin America.

You can also watch CAN’s closing press conference on the UNFCCC website.

Format:

About The Author

Joshua Wiese

Joshua is Director of the GCCA's Adopt a Negotiator project, helping activists track the roles their governments play in national and international climate action. He also publishes the Fresh Air Brief - a weekly intelligence update for bloggers and activists interested in international climate and energy issues.

  • Ariel D

    Thanks for these updates ! We greatly appreciated !

  • Guenier

    I’d like to join Ariel D in thanking you for these updates. Very interesting and informative.

    However, I find it hard to understand your partners’ welcoming “the slow drumbeat building toward the international agreement”. Is that really an accurate description of the Bonn outcome? After all, no progress whatever was made towards resolving what Alden Meyer (Union of Concerned Scientists) described as the two “thorniest issues of the negotiations” (http://www.rtcc.org/2014/06/13/lack-of-finance-holding-up-un-talks-say-worlds-poorest/), namely (1) whether the division between developed and developing countries enshrined in the original UN Convention (the basis of the Copenhagen failure) should apply to the new agreement and (2) the deep divide on finance revealed by China’s insistence that a legally binding provision of massive funding from the developed to the developing economies should be a precondition of a Paris deal: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/06/06/idUKL6N0ON2WS20140606. Just consider the developing countries’ uncompromising “draft negotiating text”: http://unfccc.int/files/documentation/submissions_from_parties/adp/application/pdf/adp2-5_submission_by_malaysia_on_behalf_of_the_lmdc_crp.pdf. Much of this would be completely unacceptable to Annex I countries.

    Surely such fundamental issues must be resolved before September if the Ban Ki-moon leaders’ summit in September is to have any chance of success? Yet that’s impossible without more detailed and difficult negotiation. But no such negotiation is scheduled. Perhaps Lima will be the place to settle all this. But the experience of previous COPs is not encouraging. And, after Lima, there’s barely a year until Paris.

    I would describe the drumbeat as ragged, uncertain - and worrying.

  • Guenier

    Joshua:

    You’re pretty close to what’s going on in these negotiations - so you may be able to help me understand something I read yesterday. It was in an article on the RTCC site by the usually well informed Gerard Wynn: http://www.rtcc.org/2014/06/17/china-off-course-for-2020-carbon-emissions-target/. It was interesting for various reasons. But what astounded me was the following statement (re China’s “carbon intensity” target): “But the target was a pledge, rather than a binding target agreed under a treaty. Such national pledges are expected to be the approach taken in climate deals going forward …”

    Is that true? If it is, there’s no possibility of a satisfactory outcome at Paris. For example, the developed countries will not hand over the huge sums being demanded if the best they can expect in return are non-binding (i.e. useless) “pledges” - especially if China (a) insists that it must be categorised as “developing” and (b) is only pledging a reduction in carbon intensity.

    Can you help?

    PS: nor do I think NGOs would be happy with such an outcome. Here for example is a Greenpeace comment** on what’s needed if the Paris negotiations are to succeed: “Governments must deliver a Protocol under which all countries take on binding emissions reduction commitments”. On the above basis, such an outcome is impossible.

    ** http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/briefings/climate/COP19/Greenpeace-Road-to-Paris.pdf